<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Eran Nachum's Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.eranachum.com/</link>
    <description>www.eranachum.com - Implementing &amp; executing my thoughts...</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Eran Nachum</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:33:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.8.5223.2</generator>
    <managingEditor>eranachum@hotmail.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>eranachum@hotmail.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.eranachum.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=69acc6fe-3ba6-4594-ae07-d3006e1211f6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.eranachum.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,69acc6fe-3ba6-4594-ae07-d3006e1211f6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>eranachum@hotmail.com (Eran Nachum)</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Did you ever get from your graphic designer a request to build a website of a web
      application according to his/her design including the strange (but nice and designed)
      font called “Myriad Pro” or some else non supported fonts by the common browser?!?
   </p>
        <p>
      The common answer that I've responded always is: “Let go for Arial or Verdana – it’s
      supported by all browsers!!, or if you want let’s put an image text with your design
      – but remember it will affect SEO badly…!”
   </p>
        <p>
      It seems that there is a beautiful solution for this “problem” which let you the ability
      to render every kind of font in the world in your website in order to get special,
      clean and “other” font layout.
   </p>
        <p>
      The free online solution for this scenario is <a href="http://typeface.neocracy.org/" target="_blank">typeface.js</a>.
      This solution let you upload your font declaration file into their website and the
      output will be a JavaScript file that hold all declarations of how to render the special
      non supported fonts.
   </p>
        <p>
      Instead of creating images or using flash just to show your site's graphic text in
      the font you want, you can use this solution and write in plain HTML and CSS.
   </p>
        <p>
      I recommend to give it a try – I did!
   </p>
        <p>
          <a title="http://typeface.neocracy.org/" href="http://typeface.neocracy.org/">http://typeface.neocracy.org/</a>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=69acc6fe-3ba6-4594-ae07-d3006e1211f6" />
      </body>
      <title>How to render non supported fonts on HTML?</title>
      <guid>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,69acc6fe-3ba6-4594-ae07-d3006e1211f6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,69acc6fe-3ba6-4594-ae07-d3006e1211f6.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Did you ever get from your graphic designer a request to build a website of a web
   application according to his/her design including the strange (but nice and designed)
   font called “Myriad Pro” or some else non supported fonts by the common browser?!?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The common answer that I've responded always is: “Let go for Arial or Verdana – it’s
   supported by all browsers!!, or if you want let’s put an image text with your design
   – but remember it will affect SEO badly…!”
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   It seems that there is a beautiful solution for this “problem” which let you the ability
   to render every kind of font in the world in your website in order to get special,
   clean and “other” font layout.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The free online solution for this scenario is &lt;a href="http://typeface.neocracy.org/" target="_blank"&gt;typeface.js&lt;/a&gt;.
   This solution let you upload your font declaration file into their website and the
   output will be a JavaScript file that hold all declarations of how to render the special
   non supported fonts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Instead of creating images or using flash just to show your site's graphic text in
   the font you want, you can use this solution and write in plain HTML and CSS.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I recommend to give it a try – I did!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a title="http://typeface.neocracy.org/" href="http://typeface.neocracy.org/"&gt;http://typeface.neocracy.org/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=69acc6fe-3ba6-4594-ae07-d3006e1211f6" /&gt;</description>
      <category>HTML;Javascript</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.eranachum.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=16ff28bf-9915-4291-933b-2dd4fed9ce07</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.eranachum.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,16ff28bf-9915-4291-933b-2dd4fed9ce07.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>eranachum@hotmail.com (Eran Nachum)</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Is it seems to be that Microsoft is going to let developers use an open source in
      order to build Windows 8 applications?
   </p>
        <p>
      I read a post on <a href="http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2011/06/02/microsoft-shows-off-windows-8s-tablet-ui/" target="_blank">TNW</a> that
      says Microsoft is going to do so – this approach will be called “New Windows” and
      will let an easy way to develop mobile and desktop apps using traditional JavaScript
      and HTML 5 for the UI layer.
   </p>
        <p>
      It is important to say that Silverlight wasn’t mentioned in the Microsoft enouncement…!!!
   </p>
        <p>
      I think that these are great news, which will open doors not only developers of all
      kinds (not only .Net developers and MS dedicated technologies developers), but to
      all “kinds” of developers.
   </p>
        <div style="text-align:center">
          <img border="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/Windows-8-start-menu-520x292.png" />
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=16ff28bf-9915-4291-933b-2dd4fed9ce07" />
      </body>
      <title>Is Windows 8 Apps to be built on Javascript &amp;amp; HTML?</title>
      <guid>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,16ff28bf-9915-4291-933b-2dd4fed9ce07.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,16ff28bf-9915-4291-933b-2dd4fed9ce07.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Is it seems to be that Microsoft is going to let developers use an open source in
   order to build Windows 8 applications?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I read a post on &lt;a href="http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2011/06/02/microsoft-shows-off-windows-8s-tablet-ui/" target="_blank"&gt;TNW&lt;/a&gt; that
   says Microsoft is going to do so – this approach will be called “New Windows” and
   will let an easy way to develop mobile and desktop apps using traditional JavaScript
   and HTML 5 for the UI layer.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   It is important to say that Silverlight wasn’t mentioned in the Microsoft enouncement…!!!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I think that these are great news, which will open doors not only developers of all
   kinds (not only .Net developers and MS dedicated technologies developers), but to
   all “kinds” of developers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align:center"&gt;
   &lt;img border="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/Windows-8-start-menu-520x292.png"&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=16ff28bf-9915-4291-933b-2dd4fed9ce07" /&gt;</description>
      <category>HTML;Javascript</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.eranachum.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=74326fc1-3f3f-4ba8-914f-53057b3178fd</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.eranachum.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,74326fc1-3f3f-4ba8-914f-53057b3178fd.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>eranachum@hotmail.com (Eran Nachum)</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <p>
      Is Google is so kind or what? One more great tool and FREE of course that leashed
      by Google is the Google Chart API. 
   </p>
        <p>
      By their introduction, The Google Chart API returns a PNG-format image in response
      to a URL. Several types of image can be generated: line, bar, and pie charts for example.
      For each image type you can specify attributes such as size, colors, and labels.
   </p>
        <p>
      If you want to generate charts, graphs, pies etc. this is a great tool for you - the
      web developer. This tool gives a good fight to all other charts generator like <a href="http://www.dotnetcharting.com/?gaw" target="_blank">.NET
      Charting</a> for example and other unwanted ActiveXs modules that need to be installed
      on the client (we always want to avoid this action - at least me), because it is FREE
      and also because it is Google.
   </p>
        <p>
      So I already generated myself: 
   </p>
        <blockquote>
          <p>
            <a href="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/GoogleChartAPIAnotherGreatThingfromGoogl_A605/chart.png">
              <img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="100" alt="chart" src="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/GoogleChartAPIAnotherGreatThingfromGoogl_A605/chart_thumb.png" width="244" border="0" />
            </a>
          </p>
        </blockquote>
        <p>
      You can find it <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/chart/" target="_blank">here</a>.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=74326fc1-3f3f-4ba8-914f-53057b3178fd" />
      </body>
      <title>Google Chart API - Another Great Thing from Google</title>
      <guid>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,74326fc1-3f3f-4ba8-914f-53057b3178fd.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,74326fc1-3f3f-4ba8-914f-53057b3178fd.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:47:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Is Google is so kind or what? One more great tool and FREE of course that leashed
   by Google is the Google Chart API. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   By their introduction, The Google Chart API returns a PNG-format image in response
   to a URL. Several types of image can be generated: line, bar, and pie charts for example.
   For each image type you can specify attributes such as size, colors, and labels.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   If you want to generate charts, graphs, pies etc. this is a great tool for you - the
   web developer. This tool gives a good fight to all other charts generator like &lt;a href="http://www.dotnetcharting.com/?gaw" target="_blank"&gt;.NET
   Charting&lt;/a&gt; for example and other unwanted ActiveXs modules that need to be installed
   on the client (we always want to avoid this action - at least me), because it is FREE
   and also because it is Google.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   So I already generated myself: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/GoogleChartAPIAnotherGreatThingfromGoogl_A605/chart.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="100" alt="chart" src="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/GoogleChartAPIAnotherGreatThingfromGoogl_A605/chart_thumb.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
   You can find it &lt;a href="http://code.google.com/apis/chart/" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=74326fc1-3f3f-4ba8-914f-53057b3178fd" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Code;HTML;Other</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.eranachum.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=71a18888-ca30-4a53-bbad-f1e383b144c9</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.eranachum.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,71a18888-ca30-4a53-bbad-f1e383b144c9.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>eranachum@hotmail.com (Eran Nachum)</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      First a small introduction to the HTML 5 introduction; If you are wondering why I
      didn't published during the last 2 weeks, the reason is a great vacation in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City" target="_blank">New
      York</a> - in one simple word - <strong>Insane</strong>. (pics will be delivered on
      the following days).
   </p>
        <p>
      Now to our topic - <strong>HTML 5</strong>. We all used to (and still) work and know
      greatly HTML 4 - which actually is exists something like a decade, but HTML 5 is stands
      in front of us (but is still to come - the work is still on progress according <a href="http://www.w3.org" target="_blank">W3C</a>)
      and comes to simplify our life (as client developers - side by side to the server
      hard work of course).
   </p>
        <p>
      Indeed, HTML 5 will going to introduce a whole new set of elements that will make
      out lives to much more easier, also based on the fundamentals of HTML 4. The main
      innovations comes to replace the HTML 4 basic elements as DIV for an instance (which
      is one of the most used elements) with simplify elements that will use to represent
      the purpose of each one of them, like header, footer, section etc. - each one of then
      is a new well known element in the new language. A page rendered with HTML 5 could
      be shown like the following code snippet:
   </p>
        <p>
          <span style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Courier New; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent">&lt;body&gt; <br />
         &lt;header&gt;...&lt;/header&gt; <br />
         </span>
          <span style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Courier New; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent">&lt;nav&gt;...&lt;/nav&gt; <br />
         &lt;article&gt; <br />
            &lt;section&gt; ... &lt;/section&gt; <br />
         &lt;/article&gt; <br />
         &lt;aside&gt;...&lt;/aside&gt; <br />
         &lt;footer&gt;...&lt;/footer&gt; 
      <br />
      &lt;/body&gt;</span>
        </p>
        <p>
      One of the new innovations is the language definition. It means that HTML 5 is being
      defined in terms of the Document Object Model (DOM) as a tree representation that
      will be interpreted by the browser. This definition came from the idea of separating
      the language itself from its syntax, which can be defined independently. 
   </p>
        <p>
      As we know from previous HTML formats (HTML 4), there are 2 kinds of syntaxes: the
      HTML itself which is serialized as plain HTML or XHTML which is serialized as XML.
   </p>
        <p>
      The coin has two sides - each holds its benefits (you also aware of it right? ;)). 
   </p>
        <p>
      The benefits of using HTML 5 (which based on the familiar HTML) are the compatible
      of existing browsers and the second thing is the acquaintance of it by the authors
      (in our case - people like me and you!). 
   </p>
        <p>
      On other hand, using XHTML 5 will encourages authors to write well-formed markup,
      which some authors may find easier to maintain and Integrates directly with other
      XML vocabularies.
   </p>
        <p>
      This is still under consideration, so we have to wait to the decision...
   </p>
        <p>
      Some more tutorials and information regarding HTML 5 you can find in the W3C site <a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/" target="_blank">here</a>.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=71a18888-ca30-4a53-bbad-f1e383b144c9" />
      </body>
      <title>An Introduction to HTML 5</title>
      <guid>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,71a18888-ca30-4a53-bbad-f1e383b144c9.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,71a18888-ca30-4a53-bbad-f1e383b144c9.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:46:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   First a small introduction to the HTML 5 introduction; If you are wondering why I
   didn't published during the last 2 weeks, the reason is a great vacation in &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City" target=_blank&gt;New
   York&lt;/a&gt; - in one simple word - &lt;strong&gt;Insane&lt;/strong&gt;. (pics will be delivered on
   the following days).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Now to our topic - &lt;strong&gt;HTML 5&lt;/strong&gt;. We all used to (and still) work and know
   greatly HTML 4 - which actually is exists something like a decade, but HTML 5 is stands
   in front of us (but is still to come - the work is still on progress according &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org" target=_blank&gt;W3C&lt;/a&gt;)
   and comes to simplify our life (as client developers - side by side to the server
   hard work of course).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Indeed, HTML 5 will going to introduce a whole new set of elements that will make
   out lives to much more easier, also based on the fundamentals of HTML 4. The main
   innovations comes to replace the HTML 4 basic elements as DIV for an instance (which
   is one of the most used elements) with simplify elements that will use to represent
   the purpose of each one of them, like header, footer, section etc. - each one of then
   is a new well known element in the new language. A page rendered with HTML 5 could
   be shown like the following code snippet:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Courier New; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"&gt;&amp;lt;body&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;header&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/header&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Courier New; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent"&gt;&amp;lt;nav&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/nav&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;article&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;section&amp;gt; ... &amp;lt;/section&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;/article&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;aside&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/aside&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;footer&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/footer&amp;gt; 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &amp;lt;/body&amp;gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   One of the new innovations is the language definition. It means that HTML 5 is being
   defined in terms of the Document Object Model (DOM) as a tree representation that
   will be interpreted by the browser. This definition came from the idea of separating
   the language itself from its syntax, which can be defined independently. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   As we know from previous HTML formats (HTML 4), there are 2 kinds of syntaxes: the
   HTML itself which is serialized as plain HTML or XHTML which is serialized as XML.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The coin has two sides - each holds its benefits (you also aware of it right? ;)). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The benefits of using HTML 5 (which based on the familiar HTML) are the compatible
   of existing browsers and the second thing is the acquaintance of it by the authors
   (in our case - people like me and you!). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   On other hand, using XHTML 5 will encourages authors to write well-formed markup,
   which some authors may find easier to maintain and Integrates directly with other
   XML vocabularies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   This is still under consideration, so we have to wait to the decision...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Some more tutorials and information regarding HTML 5 you can find in the W3C site &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/" target=_blank&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=71a18888-ca30-4a53-bbad-f1e383b144c9" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Code;HTML</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>