<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Eran Nachum's Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.eranachum.com/</link>
    <description>www.eranachum.com - Implementing &amp; executing my thoughts...</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Eran Nachum</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:28:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.8.5223.2</generator>
    <managingEditor>eranachum@hotmail.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>eranachum@hotmail.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.eranachum.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=77ff0044-d29d-4dcd-b70a-876845c82598</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.eranachum.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,77ff0044-d29d-4dcd-b70a-876845c82598.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>eranachum@hotmail.com (Eran Nachum)</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      CodeRush just come out with a free version of its well known and recommended addin
      to VS.<br />
      It provides stronger refactoring capabilities and also ease other tasks like browsing
      for files in a solution.
   </p>
        <p>
      You can check it out and some more information here: <a href="http://community.devexpress.com/blogs/markmiller/archive/2008/10/27/announcing-coderush-express-for-c.aspx">http://community.devexpress.com/blogs/markmiller/archive/2008/10/27/announcing-coderush-express-for-c.aspx</a></p>
        <p>
      C# version is here: <a href="http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/CodeRushX/">http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/CodeRushX/</a></p>
        <p>
      Another version for ASP.NET refactoring is here: <a href="http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/RefactorASP/">http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/RefactorASP/</a></p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/devexpress.gif" border="0" />
        </p>
        <p>
      Have fun ;)
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=77ff0044-d29d-4dcd-b70a-876845c82598" />
      </body>
      <title>CodeRush Xpress for C#</title>
      <guid>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,77ff0044-d29d-4dcd-b70a-876845c82598.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,77ff0044-d29d-4dcd-b70a-876845c82598.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:28:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   CodeRush just come out with a free version of its well known and recommended addin
   to VS.&lt;br&gt;
   It provides stronger refactoring capabilities and also ease other tasks like browsing
   for files in a solution.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   You can check it out and some more information here: &lt;a href="http://community.devexpress.com/blogs/markmiller/archive/2008/10/27/announcing-coderush-express-for-c.aspx"&gt;http://community.devexpress.com/blogs/markmiller/archive/2008/10/27/announcing-coderush-express-for-c.aspx&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   C# version is here: &lt;a href="http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/CodeRushX/"&gt;http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/CodeRushX/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Another version for ASP.NET refactoring is here: &lt;a href="http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/RefactorASP/"&gt;http://devexpress.com/Products/Visual_Studio_Add-in/RefactorASP/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://www.eranachum.com/content/binary/devexpress.gif" border=0&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Have fun ;)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=77ff0044-d29d-4dcd-b70a-876845c82598" /&gt;</description>
      <category>Tools;VS 2008</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.eranachum.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=be3e3a2b-5d6b-4972-91d2-26989813b3c3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.eranachum.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,be3e3a2b-5d6b-4972-91d2-26989813b3c3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>eranachum@hotmail.com (Eran Nachum)</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I waited so long on regards this issue to be coming out with much more stable
      version, and I am not a great beleiver of beta versions but I think MVC
      Beta framework is kind of stable one and ready to use (I admit it my - fingers are
      burning in order to start working with this great tool), one more thing is that
      the Beta release comes with an explicit "go-live" license that allows you to
      deploy it in production environments.
   </p>
        <p>
      The ASP.NET MVC Beta works with both .NET 3.5 and .NET 3.5 SP1, and supports both
      VS 2008 and Visual Web Developer 2008 Express SP1 (which is free - and now supports
      class libraries and web application project types).
   </p>
        <p>
      You can download it from Scott Guthrie's blog <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/10/16/asp-net-mvc-beta-released.aspx">here</a> and
      read some more details on regards this issue. 
      <br />
      Great examples and web casts you can find <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/stephenwalther/archive/2008/10/17/a-guide-to-learning-asp-net-mvc-beta-1.aspx">here</a>.
   </p>
        <p>
      My point of view on regards this issue is quite clear - I am supporting this methodology
      and work-scheme over the traditional asp.net webform that does simple round-trip
      to the server and back. One more thing is that traditional asp.net webforms were
      being done much more heavier and with low performance where including vast
      logic - not including asp.net AJAX controls (ScriptManager, UpdatePanel etc...) that
      make the page process to be much more slow and not intuitive; 
      <br />
      MVC framework got me back to the traditional web development, while using simple HTML
      code that does simple submit to the server and shows the server-side data in
      fewer code while not using asp.net server controls at all.
   </p>
        <p>
      One more great featutre that MVC supplies according to it behavior is explicit URLs
      patterns. This one helps to SEO against search engines - something that comes
      out of the box and you don't need to implement it like on regular asp.net webforms;
      that means MVC is perfect to content websites that suppost to be indexed by the search
      engines.
   </p>
        <p>
      The main question is why Microsoft came out with this framework so lately, you know
      MVC methodology is exists for years...
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=be3e3a2b-5d6b-4972-91d2-26989813b3c3" />
      </body>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Beta Released </title>
      <guid>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,be3e3a2b-5d6b-4972-91d2-26989813b3c3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,be3e3a2b-5d6b-4972-91d2-26989813b3c3.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I waited so long&amp;nbsp;on regards this issue to be coming out with much more stable
   version, and&amp;nbsp;I am not a great beleiver of beta versions but I&amp;nbsp;think MVC
   Beta framework is kind of stable one and ready to use (I admit it my - fingers are
   burning in order to start working with this great tool), one more thing is&amp;nbsp;that
   the&amp;nbsp;Beta release comes with an explicit "go-live" license that allows you to
   deploy it in production environments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The ASP.NET MVC Beta works with both .NET 3.5 and .NET 3.5 SP1, and supports both
   VS 2008 and Visual Web Developer 2008 Express SP1 (which is free - and now supports
   class libraries and web application project types).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   You can download it from Scott Guthrie's blog &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/10/16/asp-net-mvc-beta-released.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and
   read some more details on regards this issue. 
   &lt;br&gt;
   Great examples and web casts you can find &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/stephenwalther/archive/2008/10/17/a-guide-to-learning-asp-net-mvc-beta-1.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   My point of view on regards this issue is quite clear - I am supporting this methodology
   and work-scheme over the traditional asp.net webform that does&amp;nbsp;simple round-trip
   to the server and back. One more thing is that traditional asp.net webforms&amp;nbsp;were
   being done much more heavier and with low performance&amp;nbsp;where including&amp;nbsp;vast
   logic - not including asp.net AJAX controls (ScriptManager, UpdatePanel etc...) that
   make the page process to be much more slow and not intuitive; 
   &lt;br&gt;
   MVC framework got me back to the traditional web development, while using simple HTML
   code that does simple submit to the server and shows the server-side&amp;nbsp;data in
   fewer code&amp;nbsp;while not using&amp;nbsp;asp.net server controls at all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   One more great featutre that MVC supplies according to it behavior is explicit URLs
   patterns. This one helps to SEO against search engines - something that&amp;nbsp;comes
   out of the box and you don't need to implement it like on regular asp.net webforms;
   that means MVC is perfect to content websites that suppost to be indexed by the search
   engines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The main question is why Microsoft came out with this framework so lately, you know
   MVC methodology is exists for years...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=be3e3a2b-5d6b-4972-91d2-26989813b3c3" /&gt;</description>
      <category>ASP.NET MVC;VS 2008</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.eranachum.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=a9ab79e6-f475-49ce-85f4-349fee78332a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.eranachum.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,a9ab79e6-f475-49ce-85f4-349fee78332a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>eranachum@hotmail.com (Eran Nachum)</dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I waited so long on regards this issue to be coming out with much more stable
      version, and I am not a great beleiver of beta versions but I think MVC
      Beta framework is kind of stable one and ready to use (I admit it my - fingers are
      burning in order to start working with this great tool), one more thing is that
      the Beta release comes with an explicit "go-live" license that allows you to
      deploy it in production environments.
   </p>
        <p>
      The ASP.NET MVC Beta works with both .NET 3.5 and .NET 3.5 SP1, and supports both
      VS 2008 and Visual Web Developer 2008 Express SP1 (which is free - and now supports
      class libraries and web application project types).
   </p>
        <p>
      You can download it from Scott Guthrie's blog <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/10/16/asp-net-mvc-beta-released.aspx">here</a> and
      read some more details on regards this issue. 
      <br />
      Great examples and web casts you can find <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/stephenwalther/archive/2008/10/17/a-guide-to-learning-asp-net-mvc-beta-1.aspx">here</a>.
   </p>
        <p>
      My point of view on regards this issue is quite clear - I am supporting this methodology
      and work-scheme over the traditional asp.net webform that does simple round-trip
      to the server and back. One more thing is that traditional asp.net webforms were
      being done much more heavier and with low performance where including vast
      logic - not including asp.net AJAX controls (ScriptManager, UpdatePanel etc...) that
      make the page process to be much more slow and not intuitive; 
      <br />
      MVC framework got me back to the traditional web development, while using simple HTML
      code that does simple submit to the server and shows the server-side data in
      fewer code while not using asp.net server controls at all.
   </p>
        <p>
      One more great featutre that MVC supplies according to it behavior is explicit URLs
      patterns. This one helps to SEO against search engines - something that comes
      out of the box and you don't need to implement it like on regular asp.net webforms;
      that means MVC is perfect to content websites that suppost to be indexed by the search
      engines.
   </p>
        <p>
      The main question is why Microsoft came out with this framework so lately, you know
      MVC methodology is exists for years...
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=a9ab79e6-f475-49ce-85f4-349fee78332a" />
      </body>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Beta Released </title>
      <guid>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,a9ab79e6-f475-49ce-85f4-349fee78332a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.eranachum.com/PermaLink,guid,a9ab79e6-f475-49ce-85f4-349fee78332a.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I waited so long&amp;nbsp;on regards this issue to be coming out with much more stable
   version, and&amp;nbsp;I am not a great beleiver of beta versions but I&amp;nbsp;think MVC
   Beta framework is kind of stable one and ready to use (I admit it my - fingers are
   burning in order to start working with this great tool), one more thing is&amp;nbsp;that
   the&amp;nbsp;Beta release comes with an explicit "go-live" license that allows you to
   deploy it in production environments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The ASP.NET MVC Beta works with both .NET 3.5 and .NET 3.5 SP1, and supports both
   VS 2008 and Visual Web Developer 2008 Express SP1 (which is free - and now supports
   class libraries and web application project types).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   You can download it from Scott Guthrie's blog &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/10/16/asp-net-mvc-beta-released.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and
   read some more details on regards this issue. 
   &lt;br&gt;
   Great examples and web casts you can find &lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/stephenwalther/archive/2008/10/17/a-guide-to-learning-asp-net-mvc-beta-1.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   My point of view on regards this issue is quite clear - I am supporting this methodology
   and work-scheme over the traditional asp.net webform that does&amp;nbsp;simple round-trip
   to the server and back. One more thing is that traditional asp.net webforms&amp;nbsp;were
   being done much more heavier and with low performance&amp;nbsp;where including&amp;nbsp;vast
   logic - not including asp.net AJAX controls (ScriptManager, UpdatePanel etc...) that
   make the page process to be much more slow and not intuitive; 
   &lt;br&gt;
   MVC framework got me back to the traditional web development, while using simple HTML
   code that does simple submit to the server and shows the server-side&amp;nbsp;data in
   fewer code&amp;nbsp;while not using&amp;nbsp;asp.net server controls at all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   One more great featutre that MVC supplies according to it behavior is explicit URLs
   patterns. This one helps to SEO against search engines - something that&amp;nbsp;comes
   out of the box and you don't need to implement it like on regular asp.net webforms;
   that means MVC is perfect to content websites that suppost to be indexed by the search
   engines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The main question is why Microsoft came out with this framework so lately, you know
   MVC methodology is exists for years...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.eranachum.com/aggbug.ashx?id=a9ab79e6-f475-49ce-85f4-349fee78332a" /&gt;</description>
      <category>ASP.NET MVC;VS 2008</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>